JuiceFS Performance Evaluation Guide

Before starting performance testing, it is a good idea to write down a general description of usage scenario, including:

1. What is the application for? For example, Apache Spark, PyTorch, or a program you developed yourself
2. The requisite resource for running the application, including CPU, memory, network, and node size
3. The estimated data size, including the number of files and their volume
4. The file size and access mode (large or small files, sequential or random reads and writes)
5. Performance requirements, such as the amount of data to be written or read per second, QPS, operation latency, etc.

The clearer and more detailed the above description is, the easier it will be to prepare a suitable test plan and find the performance indicators that need to be focused on. Clear plans and good performance indicators are helpful for evaluating the application requirements from various aspects of the storage system, including JuiceFS metadata configuration, network bandwidth requirements, configuration parameters, etc. It is surely not easy to have all details in mind at the beginning, and some of the content can be clarified gradually during the testing process. Still, it is essential to make the usage scenario descriptions mentioned above and the corresponding test methods, test data, and test results complete at the end of a full test.

Even if the above is not yet clear, it does not matter. JuiceFS built-in test tools can get the core indicators of benchmark performance of the standalone machine just by a one-line command. This article also introduces two more JuiceFS built-in performance analysis tools, which provide a simple and clear way for more complex tests.

Performance Testing Quick Start

An example of the basic usage of the JuiceFS built-in bench tool is shown below.

Working Environment

• Host: Amazon EC2 c5.xlarge one
• OS: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS (Kernel 5.4.0-1029-aws)
• Metadata Engine: Redis 6.2.3, storage (dir) configured on system disk
• Object Storage: Amazon S3
• JuiceFS Version: 0.17-dev (2021-09-23 2ec2badf)

Attention

JuiceFS v1.0+ has Trash enabled by default, which means the benchmark tools will create and delete temporary files in the file system. These files will eventually be dumped to the .trash folder which consumes storage space. To avoid this, you can disable the Trash before benchmarking by running juicefs config META-URL --trash-days 0. See trash for details.

JuiceFS Bench

The JuiceFS bench command can help you do a quick performance test on a standalone machine. With the test results, it is easy to evaluate if your environment configuration and JuiceFS performance are normal. Assuming you have mounted JuiceFS to /mnt/jfs on your server, execute the following command for this test (the -p option is recommended to set to the number of CPU cores on the server). If you need help with initializing or mounting JuiceFS, please refer to the Quick Start Guide)

juicefs bench /mnt/jfs -p 4

The test results will show each performance indicator in green, yellow or red. If you see red indicators in your results, please check the relevant configuration first. Feel free to post any problems you encountered in detail on GitHub Discussions.

The detailed JuiceFS bench performance test flows are shown below (The logic behind is very simple. Please take a look at the source code if you are interested).

1. N concurrent write, each to a large file of 1 GiB with IO size of 1 MiB
2. N concurrent read, each from the large file of 1 GiB previously written, with IO size of 1 MiB
3. N concurrent write, each to 100 small files of 128 KiB, with IO size of 128 KiB
4. N concurrent read, each from the 100 small files of 128 KiB previously written, with IO size of 128 KiB
5. N concurrent stat, each on the 100 small files of 128 KiB previously written
6. clean up the temporary directory for testing

The concurrency scale N could be provided through the -p option of the bench command.

Here's a performance comparison using a few common storage types provided by AWS.

• EFS with 1TiB capacity performs 150MiB/s of read and 50MiB/s of write at a cost of $0.08/GB-month.
• EBS st1 is a throughput-optimized HDD with a maximum throughput of 500MiB/s, a maximum IOPS (1MiB I/O) of 500, and a maximum capacity of 16TiB, priced at $0.045/GB-month.
• EBS gp2 is a universal SSD with a maximum throughput of 250MiB/s, maximum IOPS (16KiB I/O) of 16,000, and a maximum capacity of 16TiB, priced at $0.10/GB-month.

The above tests clearly show that JuiceFS performs much better than AWS EFS in terms of sequential read and write capabilities and than the commonly used EBS regarding throughput. However, the JuiceFS performance is not that outstanding when writing small files because each file written needs to be persisted to S3 and there is typically a fixed overhead of 10-30ms on calling the object storage API.

note

The performance of Amazon EFS is linearly related to capacity (refer to the official documentation), which makes it unsuitable for being used in high throughput scenarios with small data sizes.

note

Prices refer to AWS US East, Ohio Region, differing slightly among regions.

note

The data above is from AWS official documentation, and the performance metrics are their maximum values. The actual performance of EBS is related to its volume capacity and instance type of mounted EC2. In general, the larger the volume and the higher the specification of EC2, the better the EBS performance will be, but not exceeding the maximum value mentioned above.

Performance Observation and Analysis Tools

The next two performance observation and analysis tools are essential tools for testing, using, and tuning JuiceFS.

JuiceFS Stats

JuiceFS stats is a tool for real-time statistics of JuiceFS performance metrics, similar to the dstat command on Linux systems. It can display changes of metrics for JuiceFS clients in real-time (see documentation for details). For this, create a new session and execute the following command when the command juicefs bench is running,

juicefs stats /mnt/jfs --verbosity 1

The results are shown below, which would be easier to understand when combing with the bench performance test flows described above.

The meaning of indicators is as follows:

• usage
  • cpu: the CPU usage of JuiceFS process
  • mem: the physical memory usage of JuiceFS process
  • buf: internal read/write buffer size of JuiceFS process, limited by mount option --buffer-size
  • cache: internal metric, can be simply ignored
• fuse
  • ops/lat: requests per second processed by the FUSE interface and their average latency (in milliseconds)
  • read/write: bandwidth of the FUSE interface to handle read and write requests per second
• meta
  • ops/lat: requests per second processed by the metadata engine and their average latency (in milliseconds). Please note that some requests that can be processed directly in the cache are not included in the statistics, in order to better reflect the time spent by the client interacting with the metadata engine.
  • txn/lat: write transactions per second processed by the metadata engine and their average latency (in milliseconds). Read-only requests such as getattr are only counted as ops but not txn.
  • retry: write transactions per second that the metadata engine retries
• blockcache
  • read/write: read/write traffic per second for the local data cache of the client
• object
  • get/get_c/lat: bandwidth, requests per second, and their average latency (in milliseconds) for object storage processing read requests
  • put/put_c/lat: bandwidth, requests per second, and their average latency (in milliseconds) for object storage processing write requests
  • del_c/lat: delete requests per second the object storage can process, and the average latency (in milliseconds)

JuiceFS Profile

JuiceFS profile is used to output all access logs of the JuiceFS client in real time, including information about each request. It can also be used to play back and count JuiceFS access logs, and visualize the JuiceFS running status (see documentation for details). To run the JuiceFS profile, execute the following command in another session while the juicefs bench command is running.

cat /mnt/jfs/.accesslog > access.log

.accessslog is a virtual file for JuiceFS access logs. It does not produce any data until it is read (e.g. by executing cat). Press Ctrl-C to terminate the cat command and run the following one.

juicefs profile access.log --interval 0

The ---interval parameter sets the sampling interval for accessing the log. 0 means quickly replay the log file to generate statistics, as shown in the following figure.

Based on the bench performance test flows as described above, a total of (1 + 100) * 4 = 404 files were created during this test, and each file went through the process of "Create → Write → Close → Open → Read → Close → Delete". So there are a total of:

• 404 create, open and unlink requests
• 808 flush requests: flush is automatically invoked whenever a file is closed
• 33168 write/read requests: each large file takes 1024 1 MiB IOs on write, while the maximum size of a request at the FUSE level is 128 KiB by default. It means that each application IO is split into 8 FUSE requests, so there are (1024 8 + 100) 4 = 33168 requests. The read IOs work in a similar way, and so does its counting.

All these values correspond exactly to the results of profile. In addition, the test result shows that the average latency for the write operations is extreamly low (45 μs). This is because JuiceFS write writes to a memory buffer first by default and then calls flush to upload data to the object storage when the file is closed, as expected.

Other Test Tool Configuration Examples

tip

JuiceFS v1.0+ has Trash enabled by default. The benchmark process will create and delete temporary files in the file system, and these files will eventually be dumped to the .trash folder which consumes storage space. To avoid this, you can disable Trash before benchmarking by running juicefs config META-URL --trash-days 0. See trash for details.

Fio Standalone Performance Test

Fio is a common performance testing tool that can be used to do more complex performance tests after completing the JuiceFS bench.

Working Environment

Consistent with the JuiceFS Bench test environment described above.

Testing tasks

Perform the following 4 Fio tasks for sequential write, sequential read, random write, and random read tests.

Sequential write

fio --name=jfs-test --directory=/mnt/jfs --ioengine=libaio --rw=write --bs=1m --size=1g --numjobs=4 --direct=1 --group_reporting

Sequential read

fio --name=jfs-test --directory=/mnt/jfs --ioengine=libaio --rw=read --bs=1m --size=1g --numjobs=4 --direct=1 --group_reporting

Random write

fio --name=jfs-test --directory=/mnt/jfs --ioengine=libaio --rw=randwrite --bs=1m --size=1g --numjobs=4 --direct=1 --group_reporting

Random read

fio --name=jfs-test --directory=/mnt/jfs --ioengine=libaio --rw=randread --bs=1m --size=1g --numjobs=4 --direct=1 --group_reporting

Options explanation:

• --name: user-specified test name, which affects the test file name
• --directory: test directory
• --ioengine: the way to send IO when testing; usually libaio is used
• --rw: commonly used options are read, write, randread and randwrite, which stand for sequential read/write and random read/write, respectively
• --bs: the size of each IO
• --size: the total size of IO per thread; usually equal to the size of the test file
• --numjobs: number of concurrent test threads; each thread runs with an individual test file by default
• --direct: add the O_DIRECT flag bit on opening a file to disable system buffering, which can make the test results more stable and accurate

The results are as follows:

# Sequential
WRITE: bw=703MiB/s (737MB/s), 703MiB/s-703MiB/s (737MB/s-737MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=5825-5825msec
READ: bw=817MiB/s (856MB/s), 817MiB/s-817MiB/s (856MB/s-856MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=5015-5015msec

# Random
WRITE: bw=285MiB/s (298MB/s), 285MiB/s-285MiB/s (298MB/s-298MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=14395-14395msec
READ: bw=93.6MiB/s (98.1MB/s), 93.6MiB/s-93.6MiB/s (98.1MB/s-98.1MB/s), io=4096MiB (4295MB), run=43773-43773msec

Vdbench Multi-machine Performance Test

Vdbench is a commonly used file system evaluation tool, and supports multi-machine concurrent testing well.

Working Environment

Similar to the JuiceFS Bench test environment, but with two more hosts (three in total) with the same hardware specifications.

Preparation

vdbench needs to be installed under the same path on each node:

1. Download version 50406 from the Official Website
2. Install Java: apt-get install openjdk-8-jre
3. Verify that vdbench is installed successfully: ./vdbench -t

Assuming the names of the three nodes are node0, node1 and node2, you need to create a configuration file on node0 as follows (to test reading and writing a large number of small files):

$ cat jfs-test
hd=default,vdbench=/root/vdbench50406,user=root
hd=h0,system=node0
hd=h1,system=node1
hd=h2,system=node2

fsd=fsd1,anchor=/mnt/jfs/vdbench,depth=1,width=100,files=3000,size=128k,shared=yes

fwd=default,fsd=fsd1,operation=read,xfersize=128k,fileio=random,fileselect=random,threads=4
fwd=fwd1,host=h0
fwd=fwd2,host=h1
fwd=fwd3,host=h2

rd=rd1,fwd=fwd*,fwdrate=max,format=yes,elapsed=300,interval=1

Parameters description:

• vdbench=/root/vdbench50406: specifies the path where the vdbench tool is installed
• anchor=/mnt/jfs/vdbench: specifies the path to run test tasks on each node
• depth=1,width=100,files=3000,size=128k: defines the file tree structure of the test task, creating 100 more directories under the test directory, each contains 3000 files of 128 KiB, 300,000 files in total
• operation=read,xfersize=128k,fileio=random,fileselect=random: defines the actual test task, which randomly selects files to send 128 KiB size read requests

The results are as follows:

FILE_CREATES        Files created:                              300,000        498/sec
READ_OPENS          Files opened for read activity:             188,317        627/sec

The overall rate of 128 KiB file creating is 498 (files/s), while file reading rate is 627.

More References

Here are some profiles available for simple local evaluation of file system performance. The specific test set size and number of concurrencies can be adjusted according to the actual situation.

Sequential reading and writing of large files

All files are 1GiB in size, where fwd1 is a large file for sequential writing, and fwd2 is a large file for sequential reading.

$ cat local-big
fsd=fsd1,anchor=/mnt/jfs/local-big,depth=1,width=1,files=4,size=1g,openflags=o_direct

fwd=fwd1,fsd=fsd1,operation=write,xfersize=1m,fileio=sequential,fileselect=sequential,threads=4
fwd=fwd2,fsd=fsd1,operation=read,xfersize=1m,fileio=sequential,fileselect=sequential,threads=4

rd=rd1,fwd=fwd1,fwdrate=max,format=restart,elapsed=120,interval=1
rd=rd2,fwd=fwd2,fwdrate=max,format=restart,elapsed=120,interval=1

Random reading and writing of small files

All files are 128KiB in size, where fwd1 is a small file for random writing, fwd2 is a small file for random reading, and fwd3 is a small file for random mixed reading/writing (ratio read/write = 7:3).

$ cat local-small
fsd=fsd1,anchor=/mnt/jfs/local-small,depth=1,width=20,files=2000,size=128k,openflags=o_direct

fwd=fwd1,fsd=fsd1,operation=write,xfersize=128k,fileio=random,fileselect=random,threads=4
fwd=fwd2,fsd=fsd1,operation=read,xfersize=128k,fileio=random,fileselect=random,threads=4
fwd=fwd3,fsd=fsd1,rdpct=70,xfersize=128k,fileio=random,fileselect=random,threads=4

rd=rd1,fwd=fwd1,fwdrate=max,format=restart,elapsed=120,interval=1
rd=rd2,fwd=fwd2,fwdrate=max,format=restart,elapsed=120,interval=1
rd=rd3,fwd=fwd3,fwdrate=max,format=restart,elapsed=120,interval=1